Ulumul Qur'an: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir

Mekanisme Resiliensi Qur-ani: Analisis Munasabah Surah Ad-Dhuha dan al-Insyirah

Alawy Abdillah — Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0700

Amid the rising global mental health crisis, this study aims to construct a systematic model of resilience mechanisms derived from the Quran, moving beyond previous conceptual studies that tend to focus primarily on moral values. This research addresses that gap by analyzing the structural and thematic coherence (munasabah) between Surah Ad-Duha and Al-Inshirah. Using a qualitative library-based approach, the study synthesizes interpretations of authoritative classical scholars such as ar-Razi and al-Biqai with concepts from Islamic psychology and modern psychological frameworks, including Cognitive Restructuring and Behavioral Activation. The main findings indicate that these two surahs form a systematic recovery mechanism consisting of three progressive stages: (1) Tasbit al-Fuad (Crisis Stabilization), which emphasizes acceptance, consolation, and hope; (2) Syukur al-Faal (Narrative Reconciliation), achieved through reflection on past blessings and prosocial action; and (3) Mujahadah Daimah (Growth Activation), which involves strengthening inner capacity, reinforcing conviction, and activating continuous purposeful action to prevent post-crisis stagnation. This model implies a shift in understanding the Quran from merely a source of ethical guidance to a functional framework for psychological recovery processes, offering conceptually applicable insights for contemporary society.

Hermeneutika Jorge J. E. Gracia dan Fazlur Rahman: Kajian Epistemologis-Komparatif dalam Studi Penafsiran Al-Qur’an

M Rais Nasruddin — Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0700

This article is based on the fact that the hermeneutic theory developed by Jorge J. E. Gracia has a number of similarities with Fazlur Rahman’s hermeneutic theory, which is widely known in contemporary Islamic studies. It seeks to address three main issues: the epistemological structure of Gracia’s interpretive function and Rahman’s double movement, the factors underlying their similarities and differences, and their contributions to the development of Qur’anic interpretation. Using a qualitative literature approach, this study draws on primary sources from Gracia’s A Theory of Textuality: The Logic and Epistemology and Rahman’s Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition, supported by relevant secondary literature. The analysis employs a descriptive-comparative method, utilizing Abdullah Saeed’s framework of textual and contextual interpretation as an analytical tool. The results of the study show that both figures developed their theories from anxiety about existing interpretive practices, and both emphasized a contextual approach. Gracia focuses on validating meaning through textual implications, while Rahman highlights the moral message of the text. Although they differ in their criteria of validity, both aim to balance objectivity and subjectivity in interpretation. Ultimately, their theories reflect a significant shift in Qur’anic studies from a predominantly textual approach toward a more contextual approach.

Reformasi Manhaj al-Mufassirin dalam Tafsir al-Manar karya Muhammad Abduh dan Rasyid Rida

Herlina Yunita Amroin, Syamsu Syauqani — Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0700

Reform within the Islamic scholarly tradition refers to efforts to renew thought and methodology so that they remain relevant to changing times without abandoning the religion's fundamental principles. This study aims to analyze the form of methodological reform in manhaj al-mufassirin presented in Tafsir al-Manar by Muhammad Abduh and Rashid Rida, particularly regarding the integration of rationality, maqasid al-syariah, and the orientation toward social reform in Quranic interpretation. This research employs a qualitative approach, using content analysis of the Tafsir al-Manar text, complemented by a contextual examination of the reformist thought of both scholars in their responses to the social, political, and intellectual challenges of the early modern period. The findings indicate that the methodological reform introduced by al-Manar is grounded in efforts to restore the Quran's role as a guide for societal transformation through rational, progressive, and public-oriented interpretation. The rationality employed is not speculative but seeks to harmonize revelation with the advancement of scientific knowledge. Meanwhile, maqasid al-syariah serves as a normative framework for interpreting social, legal, and ethical verses. These findings demonstrate that al-Manar advances a modern exegetical methodology that not only promotes methodological reform but also contributes significantly to the reconstruction of contemporary Islamic civilization.

Metodologi Argumentasi Hukum dalam Tafsir al-Jami' li Ahkam al-Qur'an al-Qurtubi

Najwa Rihan Zahara — Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0700

This study examines the methodology of legal argumentation (al-manahij al-istidlaliyah) employed by al-Qurtubi in his Tafsir al-Jami li Ahkam al-Quran. Previous studies on al-Qurtubis tafsir have generally focused on the thematic discussion of legal verses, the legal rulings he derived, or the overall characteristics of his legal exegesis; however, these works remain largely descriptive and have not specifically analyzed the epistemological structure and argumentative framework underlying his process of deriving legal rulings. This gap has led to a limited understanding of al-Qurtubis tafsir, which is often viewed solely through its legal conclusions, without examining the methodological reasoning that connects textual evidence to those conclusions. This study addresses that gap by reconstructing al-Qurtubis pattern of legal argumentation through an analysis of his use of scriptural evidence, linguistic reasoning, principles of usul al-fiqh, considerations of maqasid al-shariah, and his systematic mechanism of tarjih. Using a qualitative library research approach, the study finds that al-Qurtubi integrates Quranic and prophetic texts with rational legal reasoning and juristic principles to construct a coherent, structured model of legal interpretation. The novelty of this research lies in its systematic reconstruction of al-Qurtubis methodological framework, demonstrating how tafsir methodology and juristic reasoning converge to form a rigorous and contextually relevant model of Islamic legal argumentation.

Unifikasi Qira’at Dan Standarisasi Bacaan Al-Qur’an: Analisis Terhadap Peran Ilmu Qira’at Dalam Menjaga Integritas Teks

Muhammad Sirril Wafa, Muhammad Habib Rizieq Hidayat, Ahmad Saerozi — Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0700

This study aims to explain the relationship between the plurality of qiraat and the process of Quranic standardization in the modern era, in which the Hafs an Asim narration accounts for approximately 95% of global mushaf circulation. Using a qualitative, descriptive-analytical approach, this research examines classical and modern scholarly literature. The novelty of this study lies in the clear distinction between unification as a theological belief in all valid recitations and standardization as a practical-pedagogical necessity. The findings indicate that the global dominance of the Hafs narration resulted from systematic educational standardization and mass-printing policies, beginning in 1924 with the Cairo Mushaf and in 1985 with the King Fahd Complex, rather than from the invalidity of other narrations. The contribution of this research is providing an integrative model that positions the science of qiraat as an epistemic control system that balances linguistic diversity with the social need for a single standard. These findings are crucial for correcting public perception and maintaining deep respect for the various valid and mutawatir narrations within the Islamic intellectual tradition.

From Sectarianism to Scientific Naturalism? Rethinking Madhhab-Based Differences in the Exegesis of Q.S. Al-Maidah: 6

Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0700

This study examines the interpretive differences in classical Quranic legal exegesis, which are often perceived as expressions of sectarian bias. Focusing on the interpretation of Q.S. al-Maidah [5]:6, the article aims to reassess whether madhhab-based differences reflect ideological division or epistemic variation. Using a qualitative, library-based approach, this study analyzes four major works of Ahkam al-Quran—by al-Jassas (Hanafi), al-Kiya al-Harrasi (Shafii), Ibn al-Arabi (Maliki), and Ibn al-Jawzi (Hanbali). The analysis employs Ibn Taymiyyah’s framework of Ikhtilaf al-Mufassirin to classify types of interpretive differences, complemented by a discursive perspective inspired by power-knowledge analysis. The findings show that most differences among the exegetes fall within ikhtilaf tanawwu (legitimate variation), rather than contradiction. These variations arise from linguistic interpretation, juristic reasoning, and methodological commitments, not from sectarian motives. This study argues that such diversity can be understood as a scientific naturalism of tafsir, in which interpretive plurality emerges naturally from the internal dynamics of the Quranic text and the intellectual frameworks of the mufasir. This perspective contributes to Quranic studies by reframing madhhab-based differences as a form of disciplined epistemic diversity rather than ideological conflict, thereby offering a more balanced understanding of classical tafsir.

Antara Hafalan dan Tulisan: Menyingkap Mekanisme Penjagaan Teks Al-Qur’an dalam Sejarah Islam Awal

Eka Maryam Shofiyah, Al Komarudin, Ahmad Saerozi — Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0700

This study analyzes the strategic position of the Quran mushaf as a subject in Islamic literature research, with an emphasis on its ongoing processes of preservation and codification. The text asserts that the authenticity of the Quran text to this day is the result of a systematic collaboration between two methods of safeguarding: memorization in the heart (al-hifz fi al-sudur) as the primary form of continuous oral transmission, and writing in a written format (al-hifz fi al-sutur) as a means of documentation and verification. The approach is a qualitative study that analyzes both classical and modern sources, exploring the history of the preservation of the Quranic text, from the time of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) to the standardization of the mushaf by Uthman. The study results show that this dual system has been functioning well for a long time, providing a strong historical and social basis for claims of the Qurans authenticity. By emphasizing this collaboration, the study aims to respond to and challenge the views of orientalists (such as Wansbrough and Crone) who often question the texts authenticity solely on the basis of written documents. The main conclusion asserts that the truth of the Quranic text is not merely a matter of theological belief but a historical reality explored through a robust and comprehensive preservation system.

Epistemologi Etika Ekologis dalam Tafsir Al-Mishbah karya Muhammad Quraish Shihab

Abdullah Kafabihi, Made Saihu, Nurbaiti Nurbaiti — Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0700

The global ecological crisis requires a theological response that goes beyond moral appeals and is rooted in humanity's spiritual awareness within the divine cosmic order. This study aims to formulate the epistemological framework of Quranic ecological ethics by analyzing the principle of tawhid as the ontological foundation of the unity of creation, the dual subjectivity of humans as khalifah and abd as the anthropological basis, and the concept of amanah as humanity's cosmic responsibility in managing the earth. This framework is further elaborated through three ecological ethical principles governing the human-nature relationship: taskhir, the responsible utilization of nature; mizan, the principle of cosmic balance; and the prohibition of fasad, an indicator of ecological destruction resulting from moral deviation. This research employs a thematic Quranic interpretation (tafsir mawdui) based on library research, with Tafsir Al-Mishbah by Muhammad Quraish Shihab as the primary reference. The findings show that these principles form a transcendent, holistic, and applicable system of Quranic ecological ethics. This study contributes to Ulumul Quran by proposing a Quranic ecological ethical paradigm as a theological foundation for environmental sustainability.

Teorisasi Tafsir Maqasidi dan Arah Pengembangannya Menurut Mufasir Kontemporer: Komparasi Wasfi ‘Asyur dan Abdul Mustaqim

Ahmad Zaeni — Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0700

Tafsir Maqasidi, as an interpretation considered relatively new, necessitates theorization, both ontologically and epistemologically. Wasfi Asyur and Abdul Mustaqim are contemporary thinkers who have theorized Tafsir Maqasidi. The purpose of this research is to construct the theorization of Tafsir Maqasidi in the contemporary era in its ontological and epistemological aspects, with the thoughts of Wasfi Asyur and Abdul Mustaqim as the model while exploring the opportunities for the direction of development of the theory of Tafsir Maqasidi according to both of them. The method used is descriptive, while the analysis used is subjective hermeneutics. Descriptive methods are used to describe the research data, and the results are accompanied by pictures or tables, while subjective hermeneutics is used to understand the thoughts of the two figures from the researcher's perspective and experience. There are two research questions answered: first, how is the comparison of the theorization of Tafsir Maqasidi between Wasfi Asyur and Abdul Mustaqim; and second, what are the opportunities for the direction of development of the theory of Tafsir Maqasidi according to both of them? Researcher found that ontologically and epistemologically, the theorization of Tafsir Maqasidi version of Wasfi Asyur refers to the rules of Usuliyyah and Maqasid al-Syariah, while the theorization of Tafsir Maqasidi version of Abdul Mustaqim refers to Maqasid al-Syariah and hermeneutics.